Blog Post

Clean Dry Hand Dryer

Every time I turn around, it seems, I'm finding out about some new, really cool green building product. It's time to start sharing this information. Starting this week, I'll be writing a weekly "product of the week" blog. I'll be skipping around from category to category. Not every product will be brand new, but I'm guessing that most will be unfamiliar to most readers. I welcome suggestions of products I should cover. Contact me by email (alex@buildinggreen.com) or use the comment field at the end of the blog to submit suggestions.

Clean Dry Electric Hand Dryer from TOTO

In Environmental Building News, we've been touting the new generation of high-speed electric hand dryers since January, 2002, just after Excel Dryer's XLerator hand dryer was introduced. The XLerator was the first electric hand dryer that used a very high-velocity air stream to not just dry hands by evaporating water, but to actually blow droplets of liquid water off hands. By doing this, the drying time is reduced from 30 or 40 seconds to just 10–15 seconds.

By making electric hand drying more convenient, more users would find it acceptable, and hand dryers could be installed in place of paper towel dispensers. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) calculations we did back in 2002 (see inset figure in linked article above) found that drying hands with paper towels made from recycled paper (two per use) resulted in life-cycle energy consumption of about 460 kJ/use. By instead using a standard electric hand dryer, energy consumption per use is just 220 kJ, and the XLerator used just 76 kJ/use--one-sixth that of recycled-content paper towels!

The problem with the XLerator is that it's really noisy. The first model introduced generated an alarming 90 dB when you put your hand right up close to the outlet. A subsequent model dropped the noise to 80–81 dB--nearly a ten-fold noise reduction (the decibel scale is logarithmic). But 80 dB is still pretty loud.

This week's green product is TOTO's Clean Dry hand dryer. Available for several years in Japan and introduced into North America in 2008, the Clean Dry drops the noise down to just 58–62 dB, and TOTO claims it will dry hands in 12 second. Because the air isn't heated, the electricity consumption is just 510 watts, compared with 1,500 watts for the XLerator and 2,200 watts for a standard (old-style) electric hand dryer. I tried one last November at the Greenbuild conference in Phoenix, and it was certainly fast (though I didn't time it), and it seemed quieter than the XLerator and most other high-speed dryers I've tried. The air stream was cool, but the duration short enough that that didn't seem to be a problem.

Rather than blowing air over hands in the open (which some sanitation experts suggest might disperse germs), TOTO's Clean Dry has an opening where users insert their hands. An inset model is mounted in the wall, so the outer surface of it is flush with the inside of the wall; this model generates just 58 dB. A surface-mount model is louder at 62 dB (because the wall cavity doesn't absorb as much of the sound), but it still works the same way.

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

BuildingGreen relies on our premium members, not on advertisers. Help make our work possible.

See membership options »

Operation is fully automatic, with an infrared sensor turning the dryer on. With both models, the droplets of water blown off a user's hands are captured in a hygienic drainage tray where germs are killed using UV light.

The suggested retail price for the wall-mount version in a gray plastic finish (model HDR100) is $578. The price of the concealed (inset) version in a stainless steel satin finish (model HDR110) is $1,200. Discounting is typical with multi-unit purchases; contact a local dealer.

For more information:

TOTO USA

Morrow, Georgia

888-295-8134

770-282-8686

www.totousa.comTo find a dealerI invite you to share your comments on this blog. What's your experience been with the new high-speed electric hand dryers? Has anyone tried this product?

Alex Wilson is the founder of BuildingGreen and executive editor of Environmental Building News and the GreenSpec product directory. You can also follow his musings on Twitter.See more on this product in the GreenSpec Guide

Published January 12, 2010

Wilson, A. (2010, January 12). Clean Dry Hand Dryer. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/news-article/clean-dry-hand-dryer

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a BuildingGreen Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Comments

October 19, 2010 - 9:03 am

I've used the Dyson and Xcelerator a number of times and the sound is deafening. Perhaps literally, over time. Kids are especially vulnerable because their ears are closer to it, and the littler kids are afraid of them. I really like the idea, though, and though I haven't used the TOTO, I like what I'm reading and hope it becomes popular.

January 28, 2010 - 12:40 pm

I've used the Dyson Airblade a number of times--including this week at either the Minneapolis or San Francisco airport (I can't remember which!). I like it, though it did seem louder than the TOTO I tried both at Greenbuild and at the TOTO factory in Atlanta a few years ago (before it was formally introduced in the U.S.). It may be time to do a more thorough product review of both of these products in EBN.

January 26, 2010 - 1:32 am

Sorry to keep posting. Just looked up and found Airblade was launched in 2006 and available in the US from 2007. It like the Toto does not have a heating element but works 12 seconds. It appears to have a more powerful motor at 1400 W. But says it uses .00468kWh/dry. It has a lot of hygiene certifications.

The real difference with a Dyson product is its ergonomics. It is FUN to use. It is intuitive designed around your hands not some box that could be anything. As a designer and architect this is what good design is what I want to see in the marketplace. Alex you should review it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_Airblade

January 26, 2010 - 1:05 am

Here is the link. I assumed this was the most efficient dryer around. Have a look at the animation!! Seems they can be purchased in US for $1199.

http://www.dysonairblade.co.uk/

January 26, 2010 - 12:59 am

I wonder how this compares to James Dysons Air Blade dryer? Perhaps it is not available in the US. In Britain they have been available for some time. You put your hands straight down and pull up as a blade of air wrings the water off hands to drip below. Ikea stores here in the UK also have a similar product installed.

January 27, 2010 - 11:21 am

I investigated the Dyson a couple years ago and remember that despite the hype around Dyson (like anything Steve Jobs does), the Airblade was louder (by a lot), uses more energy, and dries hands no quicker than competitors (like the one profiled above). Looks like all that is still true according to our GreenSpec entry.

January 27, 2010 - 11:15 am

From the GreenSpec listing at http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/productDetail.cfm?ProductID=3624 - "The Dyson Airblade is a touch-free electric hand dryer with a drying cycle of about 12 seconds. The 1400-watt Airblade generates an air current that travels 590 feet per second to physically blow water off users' hands. Its die-cast aluminum casing has a scratchproof coating with a silver ion antimicrobial treatment. The unit’s replaceable HEPA filter (which has a pre-filter and comes with five-year warranty) removes 99.9% of the bacteria from the air used to dry hands. The Airblade is the first hand dryer to be certified by the National Sanitation Foundation under protocol P335: Hygienic Commercial Hand Dryers. The unit operates at about 84 dB and has a sensor that shuts the unit off if hands are not removed after 30 seconds."

January 19, 2010 - 8:48 am

I also used a high velocity hand dryer recently. It was mounted to the wall and protruded into the bathroom space. Hands were inserted within the unit's outer and inner walls. It did a very satisfactory job. The drawbacks were that your hands could easily touch either inside wall as they were being dried and that, at least psychologically, did not offer a comfortable feeling. I think that a child would not be able to use it because of the height placement on the wall. Still, it was an interesting concept and mucho preferable to the old continuous loop cotton cloth dryers found in gas station restrooms for years! I remember trying to find a spot on them that looked like it hadn't been used yet! :(