By submitting your email, you gain access to hundreds of BuildingGreen articles about green building and innovations and agree that BuildingGreen may send you communications with updates about sustainable design and construction. You may unsubscribe at any time. Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy apply.
Your email address is safe with us
Thousands of architects, designers, and engineers trust our research and advice... you can trust us with your email address.
BuildingGreen will never share or sell your contact information.
Your email address is safe with us
Thousands of LEED professionals trust our research and advice... you can trust us with your email address.
LEEDuser will never share or sell your contact information.
Loading, please wait a moment...
destination: /, mode: buy
You already have a BuildingGreen account — please enter your password:
Your reset password email has been sent.
Click here to send a password reset link to
Loading...
You are already entitled to BuildingGreen premium access through .
To get started, create a personal profile. This will give you full access to BuildingGreen Premium through .To get the free reports, please create a personal profile
Loading...
Create your account to join
The most trusted voice in sustainable architecture and design
For more than 25 years BuildingGreen has never accepted ads or sponsorship, making us an unbiased resource you can count on.
“I’ve relied on BuildingGreen for over a decade—it’s one of the most reputable sources for cutting edge green building news & product research.’
—Mara Baum, Sustainability Director, HOK
Thank you for signing up for BuildingGreen
IMPORTANT: Please check your email to verify your account.
You are now part of ’s group.
Watch your email for tips from our experts on getting the most from BuildingGreen.com.
Here are three special reports you can use today:
Can We Replace Foam Insulation? – There are a lot of reasons to avoid foam, but its high performance can make it a hard habit to kick, as designers are finding out.
How WELL Got Green Building’s Groove Back – WELL is the hottest four-letter word in sustainable design. But will it work to the benefit or the detriment of green building?
20 Ways to Advance Sustainability in the Next Four Years – In this age of political revolution and environmental urgency, it’s time to step back and take a look at priorities, challenges, and opportunities. Here’s our founder Alex Wilson’s take on the best ways to advance sustainability.
Although concentrations of these potentially toxic elements are in most cases higher in cement with fly ash than in portland cement, EPA has determined there is little risk of dangerous exposure.
Source: U.S. EPA
Although concentrations of these potentially toxic elements are in most cases higher in cement with fly ash than in portland cement, EPA has determined there is little risk of dangerous exposure.
Source: U.S. EPA
UPDATE 12/20/14: EPA issued its final rules, and as expected, found coal ash safe to use in building materials, and declined to categorize it as a hazardous waste.
As the December 2014 deadline draws near for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to finalize regulations for fly ash—a byproduct of burning coal—the agency released a study offering evidence that the material is safe for use in concrete and gypsum wallboard.
Using a methodology that has become the EPA standard for evaluating products containing fly ash, the study found that concentrations of 18 constituents of potential concern were higher in cement with fly ash than in portland cement, and the lowest mercury emanation rate measured for gypsum wallboard with fly ash was three times higher than the highest rate for mined gypsum wallboard. However, after an exposure review and screening assessment, the report finds that the increased concentrations are still “below relevant regulatory and health-based benchmarks” and concludes that EPA supports the “beneficial use” of fly ash in these products.
Using fly ash in concrete offsets greenhouse gas emissions, and diverting it for use in other products means less of it is dumped into landfills, where toxic substances may leach into groundwater (see “Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Cement and Concrete”). However, some say even the latest EPA study fails to put their concerns over health impacts to rest. In a recent statement, The Healthy Building Network warns that the methodology discounts high levels of mercury, was not properly peer reviewed, and fails to investigate exposures that might occur during manufacturing and installation, or after disposal.
The study does not address fly ash used in products like ceiling tiles or carpet backing—other common uses in which the fly ash is not as clearly encapsulated (see “EBN’s Position on Fly Ash”).
Pearson, C. (2014, April 2). EPA Finds Coal Fly Ash Safe in Concrete and Gypsum Wallboard. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/newsbrief/epa-finds-coal-fly-ash-safe-concrete-and-gypsum-wallboard
Project Delivery and Contracts Consultant LEEDuser, BuildingGreen Inc.
BuildingGreen Premium Member
April 3, 2014 - 10:14 am
Amanda, great question. Yes, this study is referring to the former. Coal-fire plants use scrubbers to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions, which produce a sludge that can be refined into flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum. This FGD gypsum contains fly ash—regulated to 1% by mass—and is used by some manufacturers as a substitute for mined gypsum when they make wallboard.
It is the use of FGD gypsum that the EPA is referring to as a “beneficial use” of fly ash since it is part of the composition. To our knowledge, manufacturers are not adding fly ash as an ingredient in gypsum wallboard.
I was not aware that manufacturers were adding fly ash to gypsum board. Is this article referring to the fact that when synthetic gypsum is produced by reacting sulfuric acid emissions from coal burning with limestone, there may be trace amounts of fly ash in the gypsum? Or is the fly ash an ingredient added to gypsum during the manufacture of wallboard?
Healthy Homes Material Consultant NW EcoBuilding Guild
BuildingGreen Basic Member
January 4, 2019 - 11:25 am
My question is in regards to a client's lawsuit of drywall and a zero-volatile organic compound paint that created a toxic off-gassing that made folks sick?
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a BuildingGreen Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.