By submitting your email, you gain access to hundreds of BuildingGreen articles about green building and innovations and agree that BuildingGreen may send you communications with updates about sustainable design and construction. You may unsubscribe at any time. Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy apply.
Your email address is safe with us
Thousands of architects, designers, and engineers trust our research and advice... you can trust us with your email address.
BuildingGreen will never share or sell your contact information.
Your email address is safe with us
Thousands of LEED professionals trust our research and advice... you can trust us with your email address.
LEEDuser will never share or sell your contact information.
Loading, please wait a moment...
destination: /, mode: buy
You already have a BuildingGreen account — please enter your password:
Your reset password email has been sent.
Click here to send a password reset link to
Loading...
You are already entitled to BuildingGreen premium access through .
To get started, create a personal profile. This will give you full access to BuildingGreen Premium through .To get the free reports, please create a personal profile
Loading...
Create your account to join
The most trusted voice in sustainable architecture and design
For more than 25 years BuildingGreen has never accepted ads or sponsorship, making us an unbiased resource you can count on.
“I’ve relied on BuildingGreen for over a decade—it’s one of the most reputable sources for cutting edge green building news & product research.’
—Mara Baum, Sustainability Director, HOK
Thank you for signing up for BuildingGreen
IMPORTANT: Please check your email to verify your account.
You are now part of ’s group.
Watch your email for tips from our experts on getting the most from BuildingGreen.com.
Here are three special reports you can use today:
Can We Replace Foam Insulation? – There are a lot of reasons to avoid foam, but its high performance can make it a hard habit to kick, as designers are finding out.
How WELL Got Green Building’s Groove Back – WELL is the hottest four-letter word in sustainable design. But will it work to the benefit or the detriment of green building?
20 Ways to Advance Sustainability in the Next Four Years – In this age of political revolution and environmental urgency, it’s time to step back and take a look at priorities, challenges, and opportunities. Here’s our founder Alex Wilson’s take on the best ways to advance sustainability.
By running ventilation at four air changes per hour—a challenging proposition—labs can achieve 60% reduction from the current baseline. Photovoltaics and carbon offsets can make up the difference.
Image: HOK Laboratories are notorious energy hogs. They also tend to have high embodied carbon when built new. Reining in the carbon footprint of this booming building type will be necessary in order to reach the net-zero-carbon goals of both the American Institute of Architects’ and the Royal Institute of British Architects’ respective 2030 Challenges. But how?
Two analysts at HOK have modeled multiple building scenarios to find the answer. In Pathway to Net-Zero-Carbon Labs, Gary Clark and Rob McGill offer guidance on how project teams can cut both operational and embodied carbon of labs to meet 2030 targets.
Using Grasshopper, Energy+, Ladybug, Honeybee, and Octopus, the two developed solutions for net-zero operational carbon that include:
Limiting ventilation to four air changes per hour (4 ACH)
Electrifying the entire building
Installing triple-glazed windows
Significantly boosting insulation, airtightness, and shading
Using ground-source heat pumps
These means brought modeled grid-energy consumption down by 60% compared to a well-performing baseline lab. By adding onsite photovoltaics, the total can be reduced a further 15%. “An additional 25% reduction in energy would have to come from certified offsetting programs—a necessary requirement until the energy grid itself is decarbonized,” the authors say.
Structural elements introduced the most embodied carbon, and the net-zero-carbon option achieved the best performance, using a mass timber structure (not accounting for carbon sequestration).
Timber cladding and windows were also important to bringing down embodied carbon.
The net-zero option used an insulated pre-cast panel façade with aluminum curtainwall.
Little is known about the embodied carbon of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems, so MEP elements were left the same among all the models studied.
All the same, the report notes that the best way to save embodied carbon is to reuse existing lab buildings rather than constructing new ones.
“HOK’s initial analysis indicates that, while not easy, it is possible to build and operate labs in accordance with the sustainable design goals of the RIBA and AIA 2030 challenges,” the authors conclude.
Since 4 ACH is not a viable option for many labs, a next step for HOK researchers is to explore the possibility of higher air-change rates while still maintaining net-zero operational carbon.
Melton, P. (2022, March 18). Are Net-Zero-Carbon Labs Feasible?. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/newsbrief/are-net-zero-carbon-labs-feasible
It's been too long for me to recall the specifics of JCVI's net zero, carbon neutral lab with Peter Rumsey and ZGF, which won an AIA COTE in 2016. I don't think embodied carbon in materials, embedded carbon in water & wastewater were tallied. Ditto for Scope 1 refrigerants.
It's on NBI's net zero db as "emerging" which is puzzling. So I can't say how well it's perfroming. One thing I'm rather certain of is that we were using the grid for storage and not buying any offsets--the project does have thermal storage. Even if SONG hadn't been decommisioned, the grid isn't 100% carbon free, 100% of the time. The notion of 100% carbon-free operations, 100% of the time was the premise for Shanti Pless and Paul Torcellini's 2020 ACEEE paper "ZEB v2.0". It's lofty and unless you provide a massive amount of battery storage, it will be a truly daunting target. I think the more practical target is reduced lifetime carbon from all Scope 1, 2 & 3 sources--that includes the transportation emissions. You're not likely to get to zero, but you can try and you shouldn't take a silo'ed approach to the optimaztion--that was the point of my ACEEE paper with David Goldstein and my 2020 Greenbuild talk with Kelly Roberts, Peter Haas and Ankur Podder.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a BuildingGreen Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.