Blog Post

CertainTeed's New Greener Fiberglass Insulation

Following John Manville's switch to a non-formaldehyde acrylic binder in 2002 and Knauf's 2009 introduction of its EcoBatt fiberglass insulation made with biobased binder instead of phenol formaldehyde, CertainTeed has introduced its own answer to the green fiberglass insulation trend.

The company began shipping Sustainable Insulation? on a limited basis in California and western Canada at the beginning of March this year and will expand the distribution over time. It is made at CertainTeed's Chowchilla plant in California and Redcliff plant in Alberta.

The fiberglass has 35% recycled glass content in the U.S. and 65-70% in Canada, according to Robert Brockman, CertainTeed's marketing manager for residential and commercial insulation products. Recycled glass cullet, mostly from post-consumer recycled beverage containers, is more available and of a higher quality in Canada, notes Brockman, accounting for the difference.

The most notable feature of this insulation is the new plant-based binder used to hold the glass fibers together. While Brockman couldn't divulge what plant the binder is derived from or the chemical nature of the proprietary binder, he told me that it is similar to a sugar chemically, but that through chemical modification the binder is not prone to decomposition by microorganisms. "In its final form, it's no longer a food source," he told me, and should be just as durable as the phenol formaldehyde used in conventional fiberglass insulation. The binder contains no formaldehyde or acrylic.

The insulation is also free of dyes or pigments. While CertainTeed's standard fiberglass is a uniform yellow (and Owens Corning's fiberglass is famously pink), Sustainable Insulation is a mottled tan color. Brockman says the company is very proud of how uniform the appearance is, which is evidence of consistent quality.

I was surprised to read in CertainTeed's literature reference to significant rapidly renewable content: "CertainTeed Sustainable Insulation is made of fiber glass which consists of 50% rapidly renewable content..." When I asked Brockman about that, he responded that silica sand is considered rapidly renewable, since sand is constantly produced globally through erosion and other geologic forces.

This claim is based on a report on the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (NAIMA) website: "Using Recycled Materials Is Just the First Step Toward Safeguarding the Environment," which states the following:

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

BuildingGreen relies on our premium members, not on advertisers. Help make our work possible.

See membership options »

    "Sand is a 'rapidly renewable resource,' one that will always be in plentiful supply. Thus, the use of sand as a raw material does not impose any impact on a non-renewable natural resource."
The 50% rapidly renewable number comes from the sand content and the plant-based binder. I don't buy the argument about sand being a "rapidly renewable" resource, but I concur that it is a plentiful resource that can be considered green. The binder is rapidly renewable, but the overall percentage very low. The same NAIMA report says that a typical pound of fiberglass insulation "saves 12 times as much energy in its first year in place as the energy used to produce it."

Within the local area where Sustainable Insulation is made, the price should be about the same as CertainTeed's standard yellow insulation, though there might initially be a slight upcharge. When it's shipped beyond that region, there will be a more significant price premium, says Brockman, to cover shipping costs. Eventually, the plan is to have it available throughout North America--gradually rolling out west-to-east as other CertainTeed plants gain the capability to produce it.

When I asked if the intent is to eventually shift all CertainTeed fiberglass to the Sustainable Insulation product, Brockman was noncommittal. "I don't think we have a wholesale answer yet," he told me. "We'll have to see what the demand and market says about it."

On the broader level, says Brockman, Sustainable Insulation is just one example of CertainTeed's (and parent company Saint-Gobain's) commitment to sustainability. "For years we've been working on all kinds of ways to increase our sustainability," he told me. For two years in a row, CertainTeed has been an Energy Star Partner of the Year. The company sees greener products a win-win proposition. "We're walking the talk," says Brockman.

For more information:

CetainTeed Corporation

Valey Forge, Pennsylvania

800-233-8990

www.certainteed.comI invite you to share comments on this blog. Is the building industry ready to leave behind uniform yellow or pink insulation for a more environmentally responsible product?

Alex Wilson is the executive editor of Environmental Building News and founder of BuildingGreen, LLC. To keep up with his latest articles and musings, you can sign up for his Twitter feeds.

Photos: CertainTeed/Saint-Gobain.

See more on this product in the GreenSpec Guide

Published May 6, 2010

(2010, May 6). CertainTeed's New Greener Fiberglass Insulation. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/news-article/certainteeds-new-greener-fiberglass-insulation

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a BuildingGreen Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Comments

May 6, 2010 - 5:01 pm

We share your delight in the growing industry move away from formaldehyde binders. What is not so delightful is the lack of disclosure of the content of their alternatives. To your question, Alex, the problem is, of course, that we can't know if the products are actually more environmentally responsible without transparency. In the Pharos Project we have begun to fill in the gaps on these products through patent research and other sleuthing, but that is a difficult and inexact process and should not be necessary. So we encourage designers and specifiers to honor the manufacturers who are breaking with the formaldehyde industry, but don't let them off the hook. Insist on transparency through full disclosure of contents.

May 10, 2010 - 10:00 am

Tristan: the CT Chowchilla, CA plant and the JM Willows, CA plant are comparable more or less in capacity. The JM plant has two separate production lines which are counted together for GHG emissions. The actual production rate at any given time is not made public.

In my opinion, a large portion of the difference in GHG emissions can be attributed to the lower-emitting process used at the JM Willows plant. And because the JM Willows plant makes Formaldehyde-freeTM building insulation, the emissions are so low as to not require a high energy thermal oxidizer.

May 9, 2010 - 6:44 pm

Bruce, the comparison of the JM and Certainteed plants is interesting. For additional perspective, what is the volume of product produced by each plant? And to what do you attribute the big disparity?

May 7, 2010 - 11:51 am

Tom Lent’s comment on transparency is important. But substantiation is also important. Certainteed (CT) claims its product is “sustainable” because the binder is made from plants. But CT does not have certification (nor do they even claim) that their “binder plants” are sustainably grown.

Sustainability professionals will tell you that just because a binder is plant-based does not automatically make it more sustainable. The move to plants merely moves the sustainability issues from chemical manufacturing to agriculture. In agriculture the inquiry would be directed at such issues as whether herbicides and pesticides or carbon-intensive fertilizers are used. Water is also critical – both quantity and quality. How much water is used and how much water pollution is caused? Even working conditions can be an important factor.

Fortunately, organizations like Scientific Certification Systems provide certification services for sustainable agriculture. SCS also provides certification for recycled content. We look forward to CT providing certification as a way to actually substantiate their claims on binder sustainability and recycled content.

While there are no objective criteria to determine which insulation is “greener” or “more environmentally responsible,” surely greenhouse gas emissions are relevant. Certainteed’s Chowchilla, CA plant emits nearly five times the greenhouse gas emissions as the Johns Manville Willows, CA plant (47,539 tons vs. 10,176 in 2008). And only Johns Manville has been awarded the status of Climate Action Leader by the California Climate Action Registry.

Johns Manville offers the industry’s only complete line of certified Formaldehyde-freeTM home insulation that is also certified to contain 25% recycled content – 20% post-consumer and 5% pre-consumer – across North America.

Bruce Ray
Johns Manville

May 8, 2010 - 1:30 am

If all the folk who inject "sustainable" into the blurb for their products just because it's the latest buzzword actually dug down to the levels indicated by Tom Lent and Bruce Ray to prove it, most of them would probably drop dead from the effort involved.

But that's not to say you shouldn't bother digging because, when you've reached bottom and proved sustainability, you've actually reached the green "high ground".