Feature Article

Biobased Materials: Not Always Greener

We tend to think of biobased materials as inherently greener—but even “natural” and “rapidly renewable” materials can carry big environmental impacts.

This aerial view shows unpaved roads dividing a soy monoculture from the native cerrado in northeastern Brazil. The most biologically diverse savanna in the world, the cerrado has already lost roughly half of its original vegetation.

Photo: Adriano Gambarini/WWF-Brazil

It seems like biobased materials should be inherently preferable—but that doesn’t mean they always are. Even the most “natural” and “rapidly renewable” materials can carry big environmental impacts. How to accurately evaluate their impact on our industry and our world is tricky, but the green building community is starting to take a much-needed closer look. Here’s what we’re finding.

This article is BuildingGreen Premium content

Two ways to read the full article and get CEUs:

Sign up for BuildingGreen Premium to access all our premium content

Join for just /month »

Purchase this article to get online access and a printable PDF.

Buy it now for  »

Already a premium member? Log in now

To read the full article, subscribe now to BuildingGreen Premium

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

LEEDuser tip sheets, written by our team of LEED experts, fill gaps in knowledge we’ve observed between the LEED Reference Guide, LEED Online, and LEED Interpretations. We update them regularly so that our members get the most relevant guidance for current issues on their projects.

( does not provide premium access to BuildingGreen)

Go premium for just  » Go premium for just  » Firm or campus members – click here »

Your 15-day free trial expired on

Already a premium member? Log in now

Published April 30, 2012

Atlee, J. (2012, April 30). Biobased Materials: Not Always Greener. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/feature/biobased-materials-not-always-greener