By submitting your email, you gain access to hundreds of BuildingGreen articles about green building and innovations and agree that BuildingGreen may send you communications with updates about sustainable design and construction. You may unsubscribe at any time. Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy apply.
Your email address is safe with us
Thousands of architects, designers, and engineers trust our research and advice... you can trust us with your email address.
BuildingGreen will never share or sell your contact information.
Your email address is safe with us
Thousands of LEED professionals trust our research and advice... you can trust us with your email address.
LEEDuser will never share or sell your contact information.
Loading, please wait a moment...
destination: /, mode: buy
You already have a BuildingGreen account — please enter your password:
Your reset password email has been sent.
Click here to send a password reset link to
Loading...
You are already entitled to BuildingGreen premium access through .
To get started, create a personal profile. This will give you full access to BuildingGreen Premium through .To get the free reports, please create a personal profile
Loading...
Create your account to join
The most trusted voice in sustainable architecture and design
For more than 25 years BuildingGreen has never accepted ads or sponsorship, making us an unbiased resource you can count on.
“I’ve relied on BuildingGreen for over a decade—it’s one of the most reputable sources for cutting edge green building news & product research.’
—Mara Baum, Sustainability Director, HOK
Thank you for signing up for BuildingGreen
IMPORTANT: Please check your email to verify your account.
You are now part of ’s group.
Watch your email for tips from our experts on getting the most from BuildingGreen.com.
Here are three special reports you can use today:
Can We Replace Foam Insulation? – There are a lot of reasons to avoid foam, but its high performance can make it a hard habit to kick, as designers are finding out.
How WELL Got Green Building’s Groove Back – WELL is the hottest four-letter word in sustainable design. But will it work to the benefit or the detriment of green building?
20 Ways to Advance Sustainability in the Next Four Years – In this age of political revolution and environmental urgency, it’s time to step back and take a look at priorities, challenges, and opportunities. Here’s our founder Alex Wilson’s take on the best ways to advance sustainability.
Chemistry for Designers: Understanding Hazards in Building Products
by Jennifer Atlee
Kaiser Permanente, the largest nonprofit HMO in the U.S., has used its clout as a high-volume purchaser to demand safer materials than what was previously on the market. This Kaiser medical center in Modesto, California, includes PVC-free carpeting that Collins & Aikman developed at Kaiser’s request.
Photo: Kaiser Permanente Reviewing a new solid-surface counter material for potential listing in our GreenSpec directory, BuildingGreen’s editors start by trying to find out what it’s made of. The company’s product literature and website describe it only in the most general terms, so we turn to the material safety data sheet (MSDS) for a closer look.
Now we can see at least the primary ingredients, along with “hazard identification” details. Some of those ingredients are ones we recognize as problematic, and the hazards identified reinforce those concerns. But it’s still hard to decide whether the ingredients are toxic enough to warrant excluding the product from
GreenSpec, and there’s usually no information on environmental concerns or precursor ingredients that might be released during manufacturing but are not part of the finished product.
Fortunately, at least for the generic ingredients (those that aren’t proprietary mixtures), the MSDS lists Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numbers, which we can use to search other chemical databases from government agencies and nongovernmental organizations. If any of the chemicals turns up on someone’s “red list” or a listing of “chemicals of concern,” we’ll be more inclined to not include the product—depending on the degree of concern, what the alternatives are, and what other life-cycle issues are in play.
So far, so good—but there are limits to our research. There are 60,000 to 80,000 chemicals in use today, and the vast majority of these have never been tested for environmental health and safety concerns. Under federal law, chemicals (except for pharmaceuticals and chemicals marketed as pesticides) are considered safe unless proven otherwise—this means that hazards are often already in common use before they are recognized as hazardous.
Knowledgeable green designers may go through an investigation process similar to the one our
GreenSpec editors follow, though with the tighter fees and reduced staffing levels of today’s economic climate, it gets ever harder to spend that time. New resources are emerging to make the work easier, however. This article offers some methods and tools for looking into chemical ingredients, and a framework for exploring these issues.
This article is BuildingGreen Premium content
Two ways to read the full article and get CEUs:
Sign up for BuildingGreen Premium to access all our premium content
To read the full article, subscribe now to BuildingGreen Premium
For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium
LEEDuser tip sheets, written by our team of LEED experts, fill gaps in knowledge we’ve observed between the LEED Reference Guide, LEED Online, and LEED Interpretations. We update them regularly so that our members get the most relevant guidance for current issues on their projects.
( does not provide premium access to BuildingGreen)
Atlee, J. (2010, March 1). Chemistry for Designers: Understanding Hazards in Building Products. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/feature/chemistry-designers-understanding-hazards-building-products