By submitting your email, you gain access to hundreds of BuildingGreen articles about green building and innovations and agree that BuildingGreen may send you communications with updates about sustainable design and construction. You may unsubscribe at any time. Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy apply.
Your email address is safe with us
Thousands of architects, designers, and engineers trust our research and advice... you can trust us with your email address.
BuildingGreen will never share or sell your contact information.
Your email address is safe with us
Thousands of LEED professionals trust our research and advice... you can trust us with your email address.
LEEDuser will never share or sell your contact information.
Piping in Perspective: Selecting Pipe for Plumbing in Buildings
by Tristan Roberts
The production of copper at Kennecott Copper Mine in Utah, the largest excavation in the world, contributes to copper piping. The impacts of that resource extraction, as well as the use of fossil fuels in producing all types of piping, and numerous other life-cycle impacts from manufacturing to disposal, weigh heavily in environmental choice of piping.
Photo: Spencer Musick Indoor plumbing is closely associated with advanced western civilizations such as Rome as well as withmodern industrial economies. Bringing clean and reliable supplies of freshwater into homes and workplaces and safely transporting wastewater from buildings to treatment facilities have been credited with taming outbreaks of infectious disease that remain tragically commonplace in many parts of the world. The use of lead in pipes and pipe solder—the word
plumbing derives from the Latin word for lead,
plumbum—made many advances in plumbing possible but also illustrates the potential downsides of choosing the wrong material. Some historians credit lead poisoning from plumbing and dishware with contributing to the fall of Rome.
Natural materials like bamboo and bored logs have been used to carry water, but manufactured materials, including metals, vitreous clay, and, more recently, plastics, have long been preferred for their durability. However, these materials require the extraction of raw materials; the processing and transport of those raw materials; and the manufacturing, transport, installation, use, and disposal of the product. Each of these processes consumes energy and exacts environmental and human health costs. Choosing the most environmentally friendly piping often requires weighing costs and benefits to identify the least offender.
This article primarily addresses piping choice for potable water supply as well as sanitary drain, waste, and vent (DWV) plumbing systems in both residential and commercial buildings. Although the article addresses piping choice for heating and cooling systems only in passing, many of these systems rely on the same choices of piping as potable water supply, and many of the same considerations apply. Not addressed is piping in water supply and sanitary waste infrastructure—which is most common in underground municipal systems but also appears inside larger buildings. Also not addressed is piping in sprinkler systems.
This article is BuildingGreen Premium content
Two ways to read the full article and get CEUs:
Sign up for BuildingGreen Premium to access all our premium content
To read the full article, subscribe now to BuildingGreen Premium
For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium
LEEDuser tip sheets, written by our team of LEED experts, fill gaps in knowledge we’ve observed between the LEED Reference Guide, LEED Online, and LEED Interpretations. We update them regularly so that our members get the most relevant guidance for current issues on their projects.
( does not provide premium access to BuildingGreen)
Roberts, T. (2007, April 5). Piping in Perspective: Selecting Pipe for Plumbing in Buildings. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/feature/piping-perspective-selecting-pipe-plumbing-buildings