Feature Article

Net-Zero Energy Isn’t the Real Goal: 8 Reasons Why

Net-zero-energy buildings don’t always reduce carbon emissions. These are the tweaks we need to ensure they do.

A building with a long walkway and large roof overhang.

The battery storage at Lubber Run Community Center (a NZE project) is programmed to dispatch at a time of day when the grid is dirtiest, displacing more carbon emissions than a PV system alone. 

Rendering: Tom Holdsworth
Karina Hershberg’s transition from focusing on energy to focusing on carbon began six years ago. An electrical engineer at PAE Consulting, Hershberg was working on a project with deep sustainability goals. Net-zero energy (NZE) was a given. The team was considering taking the project entirely off grid and was thinking about a 300-year time horizon.

That timeframe got them looking at replacement cycles for photovoltaics (PV) and batteries, and questioning the wisdom of organizing around net-zero energy as the primary goal. They switched to focusing on emissions instead, and they haven’t looked back. “Where my research has landed shows that we need to focus on carbon emissions,” Hershberg says. “Energy can sometimes be a proxy for it, but sometimes it isn’t.

“The blunt instrument of [NZE] is kind of an outdated concept,” says Commissioner Andrew McAllister of the California Energy Commission. If the “real goal is carbon-free energy and decarbonization,” he says, net energy use over the course of a year may not be that helpful as a metric.

What’s driving this re-think? The U.S. is now adding renewable energy generation faster than any other source, which is putting us on a path to rapidly decarbonize the electric grid. In some parts of the U.S., the grid is already relatively clean. And Biden’s Clean Electricity Standard proposed through his Infrastructure Plan would set us on a path toward 80% clean energy on the grid by 2030.

This increase in renewable energy sources both hastens the need for NZE buildings to become partners in that transition and exacerbates the ways that traditional NZE buildings will fall short on reducing carbon emissions. NZE projects are a big step in the right direction, but we must start designing and operating them differently to accelerate the transition away from carbon emissions in the building sector. 

Below we list eight ways that NZE projects miss the mark on climate goals, including how they affect the electricity grid, transportation, embodied carbon, and resilience, and how we can course-correct to achieve our goals.

This article is BuildingGreen Premium content

Two ways to read the full article and get CEUs:

Sign up for BuildingGreen Premium to access all our premium content

Join for just /month »

Purchase this article to get online access and a printable PDF.

Buy it now for  »

Already a premium member? Log in now

To read the full article, subscribe now to BuildingGreen Premium

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

LEEDuser tip sheets, written by our team of LEED experts, fill gaps in knowledge we’ve observed between the LEED Reference Guide, LEED Online, and LEED Interpretations. We update them regularly so that our members get the most relevant guidance for current issues on their projects.

( does not provide premium access to BuildingGreen)

Go premium for just  » Go premium for just  » Firm or campus members – click here »

Your 15-day free trial expired on

Already a premium member? Log in now

Published June 7, 2021

Pearson, C., & Malin, N. (2021, May 18). Net-Zero Energy Isn’t the Real Goal: 8 Reasons Why . Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/feature/net-zero-energy-isn-t-real-goal-8-reasons-why