The current Stantec/BuildingGreen featured topic is Material Health. Read on to learn the essentials, and then dive deep to earn CEUS.
Also see the Resilient Design featured topic, and also a survey of topics trending in Stantec’s regions.
Material Health
Buildings shouldn’t harm their occupants. Is anything more fundamental than that? Yet many building materials contain toxic substances with the potential to make people sick. Finding and interpreting material health information is an emerging practice among building professionals.
Understand why it’s important
Begin with Why Chemical Transparency Matters, written by BuildingGreen’s editors.
Go deeper
For a deeper dive, jump to the key concepts below, or explore our product guides.
Why Chemical Transparency Matters
Many manufacturers and trade groups have resisted disclosing which chemicals are in their products: they suggest design professionals should stick with designing buildings and let suppliers and manufacturers manage the chemical side of things.
Then why is it important for design professionals to know what’s in the products we’re specifying?
REASON 1
There may be too many chemical cooks
The Health Product Declaration (HPD) gives us a chemical inventory of a building product and characterizes the level of concern about each ingredient.
Although other data reporting formats may allude to human health effects, they fall short. Reference to toxicity in environmental product declarations (EPDs), for example, looks at health in a fairly indirect way. It focuses on public health impacts from manufacturing and not on toxic substances in the materials themselves. The safety data sheet (SDS) was created to warn first responders about what they might be dealing with in case of a chemical spill or other crisis.
But we are becoming more aware of our sensitivities to long-term, low-level chemical exposures. One recent study noted that 30 different chemicals present in common household dust all could be contributing to obesity. None on its own was present in significant quantities, but researchers think that in combination, they could be asserting a surprisingly strong effect. Another recent study looked at how multiple chemicals, each in small quantities on its own, could be combining into a carcinogenic “soup.”
HPDs can help address these effects by bringing to light small chemical quantities and giving us more data to analyze for patterns.
REASON 2
Transparency is a means to an end
Suppose you had to choose between a world in which all products are disclosed and one in which all products are optimized for minimal health impact and maximum performance. You would choose optimization, right?
You wouldn’t know it from transparency opponents, but that’s not our choice to make. We need transparency to get to optimization, and there will never be a land of unicorns and rainbows where everything is optimized.
Look at the U.S. Green Building Council’s experience in developing LEED v4. USGBC signaled clearly in early development of the system that it wanted to encourage avoidance of chemicals of concern. It also wants to move its materials and resources credits toward life-cycle assessment and away from single-issue credits.
With both issues, though, it found out that it could only make token rules because, fundamentally, the building industry lacks data. We need massive generation of disclosure data to tell us exactly what we’re dealing with—before we can really start thinking about optimization.
We commend companies that are ahead of the curve and already optimizing. But for this to scale across the rest of the industry and start showing widespread results in our buildings, we need more data.
REASON 3
Disclosure changes products
With the transparency movement several years old, we’re hearing lots of stories from manufacturers who, simply by looking to find out what’s in their products and characterize the hazard levels of any chemicals, have found that asking questions leads to change.
For architects who have asked for products with HPDs, having those conversations with manufacturers is a clear way of communicating an interest in health without boxing those companies into solutions that aren’t a good fit.
We’d like to see more companies optimize formally, but the on-the-fly optimization that happens through asking questions is more accessible as an everyday practice.
Key Concepts
WELL, Fitwel, and LEED
- LEED and WELL Product Labels: A Guide and Analysis
- How WELL Got Green Building’s Groove Back
- WELL v2: What’s Changed?
Understanding HPDs
- What’s an HPD? Health Product Declaration FAQs
- Different Tools for Different Jobs: How HPDs Fit In
- Dances with Hazards: How Real Experts Pull Human Health into Design
- Five Ways Project Teams Are Using HPDs
Textiles and Upholstery
- Three Hazardous Textile Treatments and How to Avoid Them
- Four Credible Certifications to Aid Contract Textile Selection
- A Guide to Selecting Sustainable Textiles
- Textile Choices: Cleaner Options for Every Application
- Finding Furniture Without Toxic Flame Retardants
Health Hazards
- The Five Hazard Warnings You Can Usually Ignore
- The High Price of Stain Resistance: Environmental Persistence
- Phthalate Plasticizer Toxicity Explained
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Choosing Healthy Products
BuildingGreen’s independent team of editors has compiled guides to help you learn what to look for when selecting green products that avoid negative health impacts.
New and Noteworthy
Changing Building Design for a Changing Electrical Grid
Electricity generation from wind and solar is poised to surpass fossil fuel generation in the next 30 years. You can future-proof the buildings you design today to save money and carbon later on.
Passive House on Campus: Eight Exemplary Projects
Colleges and universities are increasingly turning to Passive House for its energy, carbon, and comfort benefits. But getting the details right isn’t easy.
Health Product Declaration Matures with New Feature
The newly released HPD version 2.2 integrates reporting options for suppliers of parts that go into building products, and for managing multiple versions of a product.